Close Menu
    Sport

    James Hahn, a veteran golfer, spoke out about his ‘dissatisfaction’ when he saw Tiger Woods ‘sitting around doing nothing’ and still receiving $45 million..

    Tiger Woods’s $45M Reward Branded ‘Biggest Joke’ in PGA Tour History by Veteran Golfer

    In four years, the PGA Tour handed out a staggering $290 million through its Player Impact Program – and here’s the kicker: Tiger Woods walked away with $45 million of it despite minimal competitive participation and frequent absences. So now, the program’s harshest critic is finally speaking out about what he’s calling pure financial recklessness.

    James Hahn, the veteran tour pro, is frustrated by years of watching the tour drain its resources to fund what he calls a popularity contest masquerading as player compensation. The tour had $230 million in reserves when the program started and distributed millions to stars regardless of their competitive participation. Meanwhile, Woods claimed $45 million across four years while appearing in just nine official events during the entire PIP era.

    Serving as the only dissenting voice on the PGA Tour board, he didn’t mince words about the controversial program. Speaking to Adam Schupak of Golfweek this week, Hahn delivered his most scathing assessment yet. “We’ve effectively given away $200 million in three years to the top players in the world,” he said. “The PIP was the biggest joke.”

    The numbers tell a stark story about Woods’ limited tournament schedule. He earned his latest $10 million PIP prize in 2024 after playing just five official events. He made only one cut, finishing T60 at the Masters. Subsequently, he missed the cut at the other three majors and withdrew from the Genesis Invitational due to flu symptoms. Despite this limited schedule, his enduring ability to generate media attention and fan interest remained unmatched throughout the program’s existence.

    Hahn served as a player-director on the tour board from 2020 to 2023. During that time, he cast the only vote against increasing PIP funding from $50 million to $100 million. His colleagues ignored his warnings about fiscal responsibility. Instead, they prioritized keeping top players happy amid LIV Golf’s aggressive recruitment efforts.

    “How do you bring something up that affects our Tour in a bad way and call out the BS without sounding like you’re complaining?” Hahn asked. “Every time I say something like that, whoever wants to run their mouth says, ‘Play better.’ It has nothing to do with play better. I’m talking about our business being sustainable.”

    The PIP program evolved rapidly during its short existence. It started with $40 million distributed among 10 players in 2021. Then it ballooned to $100 million for 20 players in both 2022 and 2023. Finally, it returned to $50 million for 10 players in 2024 before being scrapped entirely.

    Woods dominated the program throughout its run. He won the top prize three times and finished second once. His consistent victories highlighted the fundamental disconnect between popularity metrics and actual competitive performance. Critics questioned how someone could earn millions for popularity while contributing so little to actual tournament competition.

    PGA Tour’s New Player Equity Program Changes Everything

    After the backlash against PIP, the PGA Tour shifted to the Player Equity Program (PEP) in 2024, a move designed to reward loyalty and create long-term stability. Instead of handing out annual cash bonuses, the tour issued $930 million in equity stakes across 193 players, with an additional $100 million in annual grants committed through 2030. These shares vest over eight years, meaning players must stay engaged with the tour to unlock their full value.

    Tiger Woods topped the list again, securing $100 million in equity, more than double his entire PIP earnings, while Rory McIlroy received $50 million and Jordan Spieth and Justin Thomas $30 million each. Though PEP was pitched as a more sustainable solution that aligns players’ interests with the tour’s growth, its critics argue that the core problem persists: disproportionate rewards for superstars, leaving rank-and-file players with minimal gains and reinforcing a two-tier structure that James Hahn warned about years ago.

    Keep Reading